MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Transurethral (TURP) biopsy of suspected anterior prostate cancers identified by MRI: Pilot study of a novel technique.

2014· article· en· W2590282482 on OpenAlexaff
Shawn Dason, Christopher B. Allard, Keith Barrett, Ian Wright, Bobby Shayegan

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineBiopsyProstateProstate cancerRadiologyProstate biopsyMagnetic resonance imagingCancerInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

230 Background: Prostatic MRI allows for identification of cancerous lesions in patients with a prior negative TRUS biopsy. Although in-gantry and MR-ultrasound fusion technologies have been reported, access to these technologies is limited. Here we present a novel technique to sample anterior lesions suspicious for prostate cancer (PCa) identified by MRI with transurethral (TURP) biopsy. Methods: MRI studies ordered by a single uro-oncologist at a tertiary center from 2007 to 2013 were reviewed. Patients were included if their studies met the following criteria: prostate MRI (n=148), indication for MRI was prior negative TRUS biopsy (n=48), PCa considered likely by reading radiologist (n=25) and anterior tumor location (n=7). Anterior tumors were those 17mm or more from the posterior prostate margin. Medical records were thoroughly reviewed. Additionally, regional medical databases were searched for 30 day readmission, emergency room (ER) visit, or positive bacterial culture result. Biopsy patients were treated with the standard monopolar TURP clinical pathway at our center. TURP sampling was directed by pre-procedural review of MRI images and report by the surgeon. MRI imaging was read by a single radiologist and obtained with a 3-T MRI with no endorectal coil employing T1, T2, DWI, and DCE sequences. Results: All seven patients identified with anterior tumors received TURP biopsy. Patients had a mean age of 63.6, Prostate-specific antigen of 13.3 ng/mL and a mean of 2.3 prior negative TRUS biopsies. There were no immediate complications reported. In 30 day follow-up data, no patients had a postoperative infection, although one patient was assessed in the ER for self-resolving hematuria and one patient was admitted for hematuria. Mean specimen weight was 4g and all but one patient had Gleason 7 or higher PCa on biopsy. This study demonstrated that MRI followed by TURP biopsy for anterior PCa had an 85.7% cancer detection rate for clinically significant anterior cancers. Conclusions: This pilot study demonstrates that cognitively directed TURP biopsy for MRI-identified anterior prostate lesions is feasible, has an excellent pickup rate for clinically significant cancer, and does not require access to limited technology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.099
GPT teacher head0.448
Teacher spread0.349 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Oncology→Same topicBladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments→French-language works237,207→