MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Elderly Multiple Myeloma (MM) Patients (≥70 years) Can Safely Undergo Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation (ASCT) but Have Shorter Overall Survival Than Younger Patients (<70 years).

2009· article· en· W2590306790 on OpenAlexaff
Carla A. Borgoño, Young Trieu, Wei Xu, Donna Reece, Suzanne Trudel, Vishal Kukreti, Peter Anglin, Christine Chen

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMultiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMelphalanSurgeryTransplantationMultiple myelomaInternal medicineGastroenterology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Abstract 3409 Poster Board III-297 Introduction: MM is a disease of the elderly with a median age at diagnosis of 65 years. For younger patients (<65 years), melphalan-based ASCT is standard therapy. However, limited data are available on the efficacy of ASCT in elderly patients (pts) over age 70, with concerns of excess toxicity and transplant-related mortality (TRM). Methods: From October 2000-August 2006, 548 MM pts were transplanted at our institution, 33 of whom (6%) were ≥70 years in age. Baseline demographics, disease characteristics, transplant and survival outcomes, including toxicities were collected retrospectively on all 548 patients and differences between the older patients (≥70 years) vs the younger pts (<70 years) were analyzed. Patients receiving a second salvage or tandem transplant were excluded. As per institutional transplant standard, all patients received 3-6 cycles of high-dose dexamethasone (DEX)-based induction therapy, underwent peripheral blood stem cell mobilization with cyclophosphamide 2.5g/m2 and GCSF 10mg/kg/day, and received melphalan 200mg/m2 for conditioning (no routine dose reductions for age). Ciprofloxacin prophylaxis and GCSF use (from day 7) were used routinely during the transplant process. Results: A total of 548 MM pts were studied: 33 pts ≥70 yrs of age (median 71 yrs; range 70-74); 515 pts <70 years of age (median 59 yrs; range 29-69). Patient and disease characteristics: MM subtypes for all pts included: IgG (59%), IgA (19%), biphenotypic (2%), IgD and IgM (<1%), light chain only (5%), other (10%) (no differences between the 2 groups). For the ≥70 yrs pts at baseline: median Hb was 98g/L (range 73-141), 22% of pts were hypercalcemic at diagnosis (median 2.38 mmol/L; range 2.09-4.24), 48% had significant renal dysfunction with serum creatinine >177 umol/L at diagnosis (median creatinine 94 umol/L; range 60-450), and 79% had elevated serum beta-2 microglobulin at diagnosis (median 269 nmol/L, range 5.8-505). No differences in baseline lab values were noted between the elderly and younger groups. Comorbid disorders in the elderly pts were common: 36% cardiac conditions (hypertension, coronary artery disease, heart failure, arrthythmias), 18% prior or pre-existing malignancy (solid tumours, lymphoma, leukemia), 12% diabetes, 12% gastrointestinal (ulcers, diverticular disease, colitis), 21% prior major infection (sepsis, pneumonia, TB), 6% renal disease (chronic renal failure, cystic disease), 6% CNS (stroke, seizures). Both renal disease and prior major infections were more common in the ≥70 group (renal 6 vs 1%, p=0.04 and infections 21 vs 5%, p=0.0003. Transplant outcomes: Although a standard stem cell mobilizing procedure was utilized for all pts, fewer stem cells (CD34+ cells) were collected in the ≥70 age group in comparison to the younger pts (median 12.3 vs. 9.1 × 106/kg; p=0.004). This did not, however, translate into significant differences in days to neutrophil or platelet engraftment, nor in days of hospitalization. For the ≥70 group, 76% achieved a PR (9% VGPR/CR) as assessed 3 months post-transplant, similar to the <70 group (p=0.08). Median progression-free survival from transplant was similar between groups (23.7 vs 21.8 mos, p=0.65) but median overall survival of the elderly pts was significantly shorter than that of younger patients (46.3 vs 80.4 mos, p = 0.03). Causes of death are unknown. Toxicities: Older patients exhibited cardiac toxicities (primarily arrhythmias) more frequently than younger patients during the transplant period (grade 1/2 - 3% vs 6%, grade 3/4 – 0 vs. 2%; p<0.0001). Treatment-related deaths, however, were uncommon in both groups [none in ≥70 pts vs 1.3% in <70 pts (p=0.27)]. Conclusions: Disclosures: Reece: Ortho Biotech: Honoraria, Research Funding.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood→Same topicMultiple Myeloma Research and Treatments→French-language works237,207→