MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2590382709 · doi:10.1049/el.2016.4043

Area efficient non‐fractional binary‐weighted split‐capacitive‐array DAC for successive‐approximation‐register ADC

2017· article· en· W2590382709 on OpenAlexaff
Wei Mao, Y. Li, Chun-Huat Heng, Yong Lian

Bibliographic record

VenueElectronics Letters · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAnalog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsShapingBinary numberRegister (sociolinguistics)MathematicsSuccessive approximation ADCArithmeticComputer scienceElectronic engineeringElectrical engineeringCapacitorVoltageEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An area efficient non‐fractional binary‐weighted capacitive‐array with attenuation capacitor (NFBWA) digital‐to‐analogue converter (DAC) is presented for successive‐approximation‐register ADC. Based on linearity and matching requirement, the segmentation degrees (i.e. the number of bits in each split capacitive sub‐array) are optimised to minimise the switching power and area. The proposed DAC improves the Walden figure‐of‐merit performance by 1.67 and 5.45 times, respectively, compared with that of fractional binary‐weighted capacitive‐array with attenuation capacitor (FBWA) DAC and conventional NFBWA DAC at the same unit capacitor size and linearity requirement.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.845
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueElectronics LettersSame topicAnalog and Mixed-Signal Circuit DesignFrench-language works237,207