“Auld Alliance”: профессор xэмиш Фрейзер и российско-шотландские культурные связи
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The text is devoted to the Jubilee of British historian W. Hamish Fraser who is one of the journal’s Editorial Board members. The article discusses not only the academic career of professor Fraser but also his role in shaping cultural relations between British and Russian scholars. His first visit to Rostov in 1989 coincided with Perestroyka ‘re-establishment’ (or even with establishment) of academic ties among the world community and it was the beginning of the quarter-century cooperation at national, institutional and personal levels. Professor Fraser’s initial sphere of research interests has been connected with history of the British Labour Movement and Scottish social history, and in both directions of his publications and in public lectures he demonstrates wide spectrum of expertise including cultural and political history, personal and supra-national levels of history. In the research W. Hamish Fraser actively applies a number of archive collections including National Archives of Scotland and Scottish local archives. Cooperation between British and Russian historians is guaranteed by emeritus professor Fraser’s engagement in research, teaching and knowledge dissemination process.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.015 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".