MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2590478046 · doi:10.1109/icci-cc.2016.7862091

Segmentation of nuclei in digital pathology images

2016· article· en· W2590478046 on OpenAlexaff
Peifang Guo, Alan C. Evans, Prabir Bhattacharya

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicBrain Tumor Detection and Classification
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSegmentationArtificial intelligenceImage segmentationHueDigital pathologyPattern recognition (psychology)Computer scienceScale-space segmentationHSL and HSVComputer visionColor spaceImage (mathematics)Medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

There are challenges for image cancer nuclei segmentation in clinical decision support systems for brain tumor diagnosis. In this study, we propose a method for segmentation of cancer nuclei when such conflicts of cancer nuclei involve `omics' indicative of brain tumors pathologically. To constrain the problem space in the region of color information (i.e. cancer nuclei), we begin by converting the images into the V component of HSV (Hue, Saturation, Value) using the level-set segmentation (VLS) in the training stage, follow by applying the sparsity representation (SR) in the test stage. Via the SR, the proposed VLS-SR would exhibits an improved capability of searching recursively for the optimal threshold level-set in the working subsets of the SR for image cancer nuclei segmentation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicBrain Tumor Detection and ClassificationFrench-language works237,207