MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Incidence of Aspirin ’Resistance’ as Determined Using the PFA-100 in Pediatric Patients with Arterial Ischemic Stroke.

2005· article· en· W2590631479 on OpenAlexaff
Margaret L. Rand, Sylvain Lanthier, Trish Domi, Dewi Clark, Anthony K.C. Chan, Gabrielle deVeber

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAntiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular Diseases
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAspirinInternal medicinePopulationStroke (engine)HemostasisPlateletPediatric strokeRegimenAnesthesiaSurgeryCardiologyIschemiaIschemic stroke

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract A significant benefit of aspirin (ASA) has been demonstrated in the prevention of arterial thrombotic events in high-risk adult patients. Despite ASA therapy, recurrence of thromboembolic events, or treatment failure, has been reported in 10–20% of patients, and this has been termed ASA ’resistance’. This term has also been applied to the failure of ASA to affect ASA-dependent laboratory tests. As there is little information on ASA ’resistance’ in children, we examined the efficacy of ASA treatment on platelets from pediatric stroke patients using the PFA-100. Pediatric arterial ischemic stroke afflicts 2–3 children per 100,000 per year, and is associated with recurrent arterial ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack in 20–40% of cases. Current treatment includes ASA prophylaxis (3 – 5 mg/kg/day) to inhibit platelet function and prevent recurrence, but it is not known whether this ASA dosing regimen is adequate to inhibit platelet function. Our study population consisted of 95 consecutive children with an index arterial ischemic stroke at mean age 5.9 ± 4.8 yrs (range: 0.1 – 17.0 yrs) on active ASA therapy (2.9 ± 1.2 mg/kg/day). Citrated blood samples were obtained at mean age 9.8 ± 4.8 yrs (range: 0.9 – 19 yrs), and were used to measure primary, platelet-related hemostasis in the high-shear PFA-100 system; closure times (CTs) were determined with the collagen/epinephrine cartridge that is sensitive to ASA’s inhibition of thromboxane A2 formation via platelet cyclo-oxygenase 1. The mean CT for all 95 patients was 244 ± 68.1 sec, which is greater than 163 sec, the upper limit of the normal range that we have previously determined for healthy children. The majority of patients, 75/95 (79%), had prolonged CTs (172 sec to > 300 sec), indicating inhibition of platelet function by ASA, and they were thus responsive to ASA therapy. 45 of the 75 ASA responders (63%) had CTs > 300 sec, i.e. CTs greater than the maximum test time of 300 sec, demonstrating aperture non-closure. The remaining 20/95 patients (21%) were ASA ’resistant’, as they did not respond to ASA therapy, having CTs (93 – 163 sec) within the normal range. Mean ASA dosage did not differ between ASA responders (2.8 ± 1.2 mg/kg/day) and ASA ’resistant’ patients (3.0 ± 1.4 mg/kg/day). 6 of the ASA ’resistant’ patients had their ASA dosage increased, and on repeat PFA-100 testing, 5/6 showed increased CTs > 163 sec. In conclusion, in children with arterial ischemic stroke, the majority, 79%, demonstrate inhibition of platelet function, as determined using the PFA-100, by ASA therapy at a mean dose of 2.9 mg/kg/day. The reason for the lack of inhibition of platelet function in 21% of pediatric patients, whether increased ASA dosage or alternative anti-platelet agents (e.g. clopidogrel) should be used in ASA ’resistant’ patients, and the relationship between ASA ’resistance’ and recurrence of arterial thrombotic events in children require further studies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicAntiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular DiseasesFrench-language works237,207