Incidence of Aspirin ’Resistance’ as Determined Using the PFA-100 in Pediatric Patients with Arterial Ischemic Stroke.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract A significant benefit of aspirin (ASA) has been demonstrated in the prevention of arterial thrombotic events in high-risk adult patients. Despite ASA therapy, recurrence of thromboembolic events, or treatment failure, has been reported in 10–20% of patients, and this has been termed ASA ’resistance’. This term has also been applied to the failure of ASA to affect ASA-dependent laboratory tests. As there is little information on ASA ’resistance’ in children, we examined the efficacy of ASA treatment on platelets from pediatric stroke patients using the PFA-100. Pediatric arterial ischemic stroke afflicts 2–3 children per 100,000 per year, and is associated with recurrent arterial ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack in 20–40% of cases. Current treatment includes ASA prophylaxis (3 – 5 mg/kg/day) to inhibit platelet function and prevent recurrence, but it is not known whether this ASA dosing regimen is adequate to inhibit platelet function. Our study population consisted of 95 consecutive children with an index arterial ischemic stroke at mean age 5.9 ± 4.8 yrs (range: 0.1 – 17.0 yrs) on active ASA therapy (2.9 ± 1.2 mg/kg/day). Citrated blood samples were obtained at mean age 9.8 ± 4.8 yrs (range: 0.9 – 19 yrs), and were used to measure primary, platelet-related hemostasis in the high-shear PFA-100 system; closure times (CTs) were determined with the collagen/epinephrine cartridge that is sensitive to ASA’s inhibition of thromboxane A2 formation via platelet cyclo-oxygenase 1. The mean CT for all 95 patients was 244 ± 68.1 sec, which is greater than 163 sec, the upper limit of the normal range that we have previously determined for healthy children. The majority of patients, 75/95 (79%), had prolonged CTs (172 sec to > 300 sec), indicating inhibition of platelet function by ASA, and they were thus responsive to ASA therapy. 45 of the 75 ASA responders (63%) had CTs > 300 sec, i.e. CTs greater than the maximum test time of 300 sec, demonstrating aperture non-closure. The remaining 20/95 patients (21%) were ASA ’resistant’, as they did not respond to ASA therapy, having CTs (93 – 163 sec) within the normal range. Mean ASA dosage did not differ between ASA responders (2.8 ± 1.2 mg/kg/day) and ASA ’resistant’ patients (3.0 ± 1.4 mg/kg/day). 6 of the ASA ’resistant’ patients had their ASA dosage increased, and on repeat PFA-100 testing, 5/6 showed increased CTs > 163 sec. In conclusion, in children with arterial ischemic stroke, the majority, 79%, demonstrate inhibition of platelet function, as determined using the PFA-100, by ASA therapy at a mean dose of 2.9 mg/kg/day. The reason for the lack of inhibition of platelet function in 21% of pediatric patients, whether increased ASA dosage or alternative anti-platelet agents (e.g. clopidogrel) should be used in ASA ’resistant’ patients, and the relationship between ASA ’resistance’ and recurrence of arterial thrombotic events in children require further studies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".