MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2590641870 · doi:10.15826/umj.2016.106.060

International Students Recruiting as an Element of Russian Universities Internationalization

2016· article· en· W2590641870 on OpenAlex
S. M. Yakovleva

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity Management Practice and Analysis · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicEducational Innovations and Challenges
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInternationalizationTRIPS architecturePosition (finance)Process (computing)Christian ministryPublic relationsPolitical scienceWork (physics)Higher educationControl (management)Space (punctuation)State (computer science)SociologyBusinessManagementEngineeringEconomicsComputer scienceInternational tradeLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The article falls under review category. The aim of the article is to find a solution to the problem of international student recruiting management, forming a more overall approach to recruiting management including adjacent stages. The article has been written because of the growing interest towards internationalization and foreign student recruiting as part of internationalization process. Often Russian universities see recruiting as an independent process aimed at achieving certain control numbers, whereas in the international educational space recruiting is one of the elements of interacting with foreign students. The article provides an overview of approaches to attracting foreign students both in countries having the leading position in this field (the USA, Canada) and in South Pacific countries and Eastern Europe that have recently started an active development in this area. The authors used such methods as theoretical analysis of the course, statistical data analysis, interviews with heads of departments dealing with foreign students recruiting at international educational institutions, analyzing organization of recruiting activities during international business trips. The article demonstrates that despite active state support of foreign students recruiting in the abovementioned countries, results of recruiting largely depend on activities of universities themselves. The stated goal can be reached by coherent work at two levels: state and intra-university. At the state level it means supporting continuous dialogue between universities and the Ministry of Education; at intra-university it requires using complex recruiting technology. The value of the article is in suggesting practical steps on organizing pre-recruiting, recruiting and post- recruiting activities at the university level. The article is of interest for vice-rectors on international activities aimed at foreign students recruitment, heads of international offices, and foreign students recruiting offices.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.972
Threshold uncertainty score0.214

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it