MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2590682676

Effectiveness of the Disaster Risk Management System in Pakistan

2016· article· en· W2590682676 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Atta‐ur Rahman

Bibliographic record

VenueArab world geographer · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDisaster Management and Resilience
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEmergency managementDisaster risk reductionNatural disasterGovernment (linguistics)Environmental planningLegislationBusinessRisk managementEnvironmental resource managementGeographyEconomic growthPolitical scienceFinanceEconomics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Disasters have created new policy requirements for global, regional, and local planning agencies and require effective national strategies, institutional frameworks, and legislation. Globally, disasters claim thousands of human casualties each year, and the number of disasters is expected to rise further as a result of climate change. Pakistan is no exception to this global trend; it is vulnerable to numerous natural disasters such as earthquakes, floods, landslides, drought, tsunami, and extreme temperatures. However, the impact of such disasters can be minimized through systematic disaster risk reduction (DRR) approaches. This study analyzes the disaster management system, policies, and practices in Pakistan. The government of Pakistan recently approved the National Disaster Management Act (DMA) 2010, under which the National Disaster Management Authority was established to coordinate and manage DRR activities. In view of radical changes in institutional development, the government has also developed a ...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.055

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArab world geographerSame topicDisaster Management and ResilienceFrench-language works237,207