MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Managing chemotherapy drug shortages in Ontario.

2013· article· en· W2590702803 on OpenAlexaffabout
Leonard Kaizer, Sherrie Hertz, Lyndee Yeung, Lisa Milgram, Scott Gavura, R. Shankar Iyer, Monika K. Krzyzanowska

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicPharmaceutical Economics and Policy
Canadian institutionsCancer Care Ontario
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineEconomic shortageChemotherapyDrugIntensive care medicineSurgeryPharmacology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

192 Background: Chemotherapy drug shortages are common and unpredictable. The causes are multifactorial and the negative effects on patients and practitioners have been well described. In an effort to mitigate the impact of this problem, Cancer Care Ontario (CCO) has developed a coordinated approach to the management of chemotherapy drug shortages. Tactics have included a system level strategy to promote communication through a virtual collaborative workspace for providers to network and share management strategies and inventory, where feasible. Disease site experts have also developed clinical guidance for the management of specific drug shortages which have then supported public funding decisions that enabled the use of substitute chemotherapy agents in a number of instances. Methods: The impact and management of a recent shortage of liposomal doxorubicin (LD), a publically funded drug for patients with platinum refractory ovarian cancer is described for both new chemotherapy starts and for prevalent LD treated cases. Expert clinical guidance supported a funding policy amendment so patients already on treatment could switch to a recognized substitute drug, topotecan (TT). This also became the preferred funded option for new platinum refractory patients. Results: LD was in short supply between August 2011 and December 2012. In the quarter prior to shortage, 83 new platinum refractory patients started on LD and 1 on TT. During that time, the average number of monthly prevalent LD and TT treated cases was 80 and 4 respectively. For the first quarter post shortage, 20 new patients started on LD and 34 patients started on TT. The average monthly prevalent treated cases were 49 and 21 respectively. Funding for the switch from LD to TT was requested in only 7 cases. Therefore, the total number of new and prevalent treated cases on either preferred therapy dropped post LD shortage. This decline worsened with each subsequent quarter and immediately returned to baseline when the shortage resolved. Drug procurement costs were lower during the period of shortage. Conclusions: Drug shortages have a significant impact on patients and providers. Even when appropriate substitutes are available, quality of care may be affected.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.956
Threshold uncertainty score0.319

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.192
GPT teacher head0.430
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicPharmaceutical Economics and PolicyFrench-language works237,207