MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2590703941 · doi:10.1182/blood.v116.21.192.192

Apixaban Versus Enoxaparin for Thromboprophylaxis After Joint Replacement Surgery: Pooled Analysis of Major Venous Thromboembolism and Bleeding In 8,464 Patients From the ADVANCE 2 and 3 Trials

2010· article· en· W2590703941 on OpenAlexaff
Gary E. Raskob, Alexander Gallus, Graham F. Pineo, Dalei Chen, Luz M. Ramirez, Michael R. Lassen

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicVenous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineApixabanSurgeryDeep veinPulmonary embolismThrombosisKnee replacementEnoxaparin sodiumMyocardial infarctionPlaceboRandomized controlled trialStroke (engine)RivaroxabanAtrial fibrillationInternal medicineArthroplastyWarfarinLow molecular weight heparin

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Abstract 192 Thromboprophylaxis after joint replacement surgery is evidence-based standard care. Usually, when thromboprophylaxis regimens with new anticoagulants have been more effective than existing standard practice they have also caused increased bleeding. Apixaban, a novel orally administered factor Xa inhibitor, has been evaluated in three phase 3 randomized, double-blind, double-dummy clinical trials (the ADVANCE studies) for the prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE) after hip or knee replacement. A pre-specified aim of this program, in order to provide more precise estimates of the incidences of major VTE, bleeding, and the additional safety outcomes of myocardial infarction, stroke, and liver function, was to combine data from the two trials comparing apixaban 2.5 mg twice daily with the same enoxaparin regimen of 40 mg once daily (ADVANCE-2 and 3). Major VTE was defined a priori as the composite of adjudicated symptomatic or asymptomatic proximal deep-vein thrombosis (popliteal, femoral, or iliac vein thrombosis), non-fatal pulmonary embolism, and VTE-related death, counted if they occurred during the intended treatment period for each trial or within 2 days after the last dose of study medication, whichever was longer. The bleeding outcomes of major bleeding (adapted from ISTH criteria), clinically relevant non-major bleeding, and the composite of major and clinically relevant non-major bleeding, were counted if they occurred during the treatment period or within 2 days after the last dose of study medication. In both studies, subcutaneous enoxaparin (or placebo) was started 12±3 hours before operation, and resumed after surgery according to the investigator's standard of care, and oral apixaban (or placebo) was initiated 12 to 24 hours after wound closure (typically on the morning after surgery). Study medications were continued for 10 to 14 days after knee arthroplasty in ADVANCE- 2, and for 32 to 38 days after hip replacement in ADVANCE- 3. In both studies, mandatory bilateral venography was done at the end of the intended treatment period to assess the presence or absence of asymptomatic deep-vein thrombosis, and clinically suspected VTE was confirmed or excluded by objective testing. Patients were followed-up 30±5 and 60±5 days after the last dose of study medication. All venograms and all episodes of suspected VTE, bleeding, myocardial infarction, stroke, or death were adjudicated without knowledge of assigned treatment by an independent central adjudication committee. The site of bleeding was analysed as reported by the investigator. The pooled analysis was stratified by the type of joint replacement (hip or knee) for statistical calculations. A total of 8,564 patients were randomized in the ADVANCE-2 and 3 trials. Major VTE occurred in 23 of 3,394 evaluable patients (0.68%) in the apixaban group and in 51 of 3,394 (1.50%) evaluable patients in the enoxaparin group (absolute risk difference, -0.76%, 95% CI, -1.23% to -0.30%). Major bleeding occurred in 31 of 4,174 patients (0.74%) who received apixaban (18 occurred before the first dose) and in 32 of 4,167 patients (0.77%) given enoxaparin (absolute risk difference -0.02%, 95% CI, -0.40% to 0.35%). Major bleeding at the surgical site occurred in 26 apixaban and 27 enoxaparin patients (absolute risk difference -0.02%, 95% CI, -0.37% to 0.32%). The composite of major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding occurred in 182 patients (4.36%) given apixaban, compared with 206 patients (4.94%) given enoxaparin (absolute risk difference -0.58%, 95% CI, -1.49% to 0.32%); these bleeding events occurred at the surgical site in 135 (3.23%) apixaban patients, and in 155 (3.72%) enoxaparin patients (absolute risk difference -0.49%, 95% CI, -1.27% to 0.30%). Myocardial infarction or stroke during treatment or follow-up occurred in 13 patients (0.31%) in the apixaban group and in 10 patients (0.24%) in the enoxaparin group (absolute risk difference 0.07%, 95% CI, -0.15% to 0.30%). Elevated levels (>3 times upper normal limit) of enzymes ALT or AST occurred in 2.2% and 2.8% of apixaban patients respectively, and in 3.0% and 2.8% of enoxaparin patients respectively. The apixaban regimen was more effective than enoxaparin 40 mg once daily for preventing major VTE, without increased bleeding, and has the clinical advantages of oral administration and later initiation 12 to 24 hours post-operatively. Disclosures: Raskob: BMS: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bayer: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Johnson and Johnson: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi Aventis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda R and D: Consultancy; GSK: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Boehringer Ingelheim: Consultancy. Off Label Use: Apixaban is an experimental drug being evaluated in phase 3 clinical trials for the prevention and treatment of thromboembolic disease. Research reults will be discussed. Gallus:BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bayer: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Boehringer Ingelheim: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi Aventis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astellas: Consultancy; Progen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Pineo:BMS: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Boehringer Ingelheim: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Sanofi Aventis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Chen:BMS: Employment. Ramirez:BMS: Employment. Lassen:BMS: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bayer: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Sanofi Aventis: Consultancy; Astellas Pharma: Consultancy; GSK: Consultancy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.016
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.016
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.084

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0160.016
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0100.021
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood→Same topicVenous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management→French-language works237,207→