MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Long-term outcomes among patients who achieve complete or near-complete responses after the induction phase of bladder-preserving combined modality therapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer: A pooled analysis of RTOG 9906 and 0233.

2014· article· en· W2590714628 on OpenAlexaff
Тимур Митин, Asha George, Anthony L. Zietman, Donald S. Kaufman, Robert G. Uzzo, Robert Dreicer, Niall M. Heney, H. James Wallace, Luís Souhami, M.C. Dobelbower, Howard M. Sandler, William U. Shipley

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
Canadian institutionsMcGill University Health Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCystectomyBladder cancerUrologyCumulative incidenceSurgeryInternal medicineOncologyCohortCancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

284 Background: Bladder preserving combined-modality therapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) includes transurethral resection and concurrent chemo-RT given in two phases. After the induction phase with chemo-RT to 40 Gy the tumor response is assessed by cystoscopic biopsies and urine cytology. Early salvage cystectomy is promptly offered in case of persistent disease, otherwise patients proceed to consolidation chemo-RT to 64 Gy. The two most recent RTOG protocols 9906 and 0233 allowed patients with near-complete response (Ta or Tis) after the induction phase to proceed to consolidation. Methods: We performed a pooled analysis of 119 eligible patients with MIBC enrolled on RTOG trials 9906 and 0233, who were classified as having a complete (T0) or near-complete (Ta or Tis) response after induction chemo-RT and completed consolidation with a total RT dose of at least 60 Gy. We estimated bladder recurrence, salvage cystectomy rates and disease-specific survival by the cumulative incidence method and bladder-intact and overall survivals by the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: Among 119 eligible patients, 101 (85%) achieved T0 and 18 (15%) achieved Ta or Tis after induction chemo-RT and proceeded to consolidation. After a median follow-up of 5.9 years, 36/101 (36%) T0 patients vs. 5/18 (28%) Ta or Tis patients experienced bladder recurrence (p=0.52). Fourteen patients among complete responders eventually required late salvage cystectomy for tumor recurrence, in comparison to one patient among near-complete responders (p=0.47). Disease-specific, bladder-intact, and overall survivals were not significantly different. Conclusions: There is no apparent difference in the bladder recurrence and salvage cystectomy rates between complete and near-complete responders as judged at the time of cystoscopic evaluation after induction phase of bladder preserving CMT. It is appropriate to recommend that patients with Ta or Tis after induction chemo-RT continue with bladder-sparing therapy. This project was supported by RTOG grant U10 CA21661 and CCOP grant U10 CA37422 from the NCI.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.048

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.010
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.160
GPT teacher head0.464
Teacher spread0.304 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Oncology→Same topicBladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments→French-language works237,207→