MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2590776442 · doi:10.1515/astro-2017-0035

Constraining the Evolution of ZZ Ceti

2003· article· en· W2590776442 on OpenAlexaff
Anjum S. Mukadam, S. O. Kepler, D. E. Winget, R. E. Nather, Mukremin Kilic, Fergal Mullally, Ted von Hippel, S. J. Kleinman, A. Nitta, Joyce Ann Guzik, Paul A. Bradley, J. Matthews, K. Sekiguchi, D. J. Sullivan, R. R. Shobbrook, P. V. Birch, Xue-Jian Jiang, D. Xu, S. C. Joshi, Β. N. Ashoka, P. Ibbetson, E. Leibowitz, E. O. Ofek, E. Meištas, R. Janulis, D. Ališauskas, R. Kalytis, G. Handler, D. Kilkenny, D. O’Donoghue, D. W. Kurtz, M. Müller, P. Moskalik, W. Ogłoza, S. Zoła, J. Krzesiński, F. Johannessen, J. M. González-Pérez, J. E. Solheim, R. Silvotti, S. Bernabei, G. Vauclair, N. Dolez, Jian-Ning Fu, M. Chevreton, M. Manteiga, O. Suárez, A. Ulla, M. S. Cunha, Τ. S. Metcalfe, A. Kanaan, L. Fraga, A. F. M. Costa, O. Giovannini, G. Fontaine, P. Bergeron, M. S. O’Brien, D. Sanwal, M. A. Wood, Thomas J. Ahrens, N. M. Silvestri, E. W. Klumpe, S. D. Kawaler, R. L. Riddle, M. D. Reed, T. K. Watson

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen Astronomy · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicStellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationNational Science Foundation
KeywordsPhysicsWhite dwarfAstrophysicsPlanetAtmosphere (unit)Orbital periodProper motionAstronomyStarsMeteorology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We report our analysis of the stability of pulsation periods in the DAV star (pulsating hydrogen atmosphere white dwarf) ZZ Ceti, also called R548. Based on observations that span 31 years, we conclude that the period 213.132605 s observed in ZZ Ceti drifts at a rate dP/dt≤(5.5±1.9)×10 Constraining the cooling rate of ZZ Ceti aids theoretical evolutionary models and white dwarf cosmochronology. The drift rate of this clock is small enough that reflex motion caused by any orbital planets is detectable within limits; our Ṗ constraint places limits on the mass and/or distance of any orbital companions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen AstronomySame topicStellar, planetary, and galactic studiesFrench-language works237,207