MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2590799185 · doi:10.1177/2513826x1500100102

Communication Between the Transverse Cervical Nerve and the Marginal Mandibular Branch of the Facial Nerve: A Rare Anatomical Variant

2015· article· en· W2590799185 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Toshinori Iwai, Maiko Shibasaki, Hideyuki Nakashima, Senri Oguri, Makoto Hirota, Kenji Mitsudo, Iwai Tohnai

Bibliographic record

VenuePlastic Surgery Case Studies · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicFacial Nerve Paralysis Treatment and Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFacial nerveMedicineCervical NerveAnatomyCervical plexusTrigeminal nerveMandibular nerveDentistryNerve rootMolar

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Although anatomical knowledge of the facial nerve (FN) is very important to avoid iatrogenic injury during surgery, surgeons are concerned less with the cervical branch, which plays a definitive role in lower lip esthetic and function compared with other branches of the FN. Although communication between branches of the cervical plexus and FN is not well documented, the transverse cervical nerve commonly communicates with the cervical branch of the FN. There are few reports describing direct communication with the marginal mandibular branch. As a rare anatomical variant, the authors report communication between the transverse cervical nerve and the marginal mandibular branch of the FN.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.004
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0050.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.066
GPT teacher head0.324
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePlastic Surgery Case StudiesSame topicFacial Nerve Paralysis Treatment and ResearchFrench-language works237,207