MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2590852756 · doi:10.1177/229255030100900101

Effects of Anticoagulants with Danshen on Patency of Dacron Microprostheses in Animal Experiments

2001· article· en· W2590852756 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Yeyang Li, Tian-zeng Li, Pei-Hong Liang, Xilin Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Plastic Surgery · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPeripheral Artery Disease Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineNeointimaThrombusPercutaneousSurgeryUltrasoundAnastomosisFemoral arteryStentUrologyRadiologyRestenosis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To study the effectiveness of anticoagulants, especially those with Danshen, on patency of vascular microprostheses, 20 Dacron microprostheses of 1.2 mm inner diameter and 15 mm in length were implanted into femoral arteries of rabbits by using microsurgical techniques for end-to-end anastomosis. Forty rabbits were randomly assigned to either the experimental group or the control group. The experimental group was given anticoagulative therapy. Percutaneous Doppler ultrasound, colour flow duplex, femoral arteriogram, gross inspection and light microscopic examination were used to evaluate the patency of the microprostheses. In the control group, six of the 20 grafts occluded at an early phase and two occluded at a later phase. In contrast, all 20 grafts in the experimental group remained patent four weeks after implantation. Histological examination showed that the grafts in the experimental group were completely re-endothelialized. The present anticoagulative regimen played an important role in preventing the formation of a mural thrombus, which benefited the formation of a neointima in the short term.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Plastic SurgerySame topicPeripheral Artery Disease ManagementFrench-language works237,207