The art of knowing: Designing a nursing professional development program based on American nurses’ experiences of providing care to Arab Muslims
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective and methods: The purpose of this project was to gain insight into American nurses’ experiences of providing care to Arab Muslims in order to design a nursing professional development program that supports the provision of culturally congruent care to Arab Muslims. Empirical, personal, ethical, and aesthetic ways of knowing were used to generate a comprehensive view of how American nurses describe their experiences of providing care to Arab Muslims.Results: Prevailing themes included culture care knowledge, modesty, gender-specific considerations, privacy and dignity, cleanliness, worship rites, and the concept of In Shallah. Not having enough time was a significant factor influencing nurses’ intentions to provide culturally congruent care. Nurses also shared that it was less important to meet the culture care needs of acutely or critically ill patients.Conclusions: The themes underscored the value of including empirical, personal, ethical, and aesthetic knowledge in the design of a nursing professional development programs in the United States and globally.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".