MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2590956196

Millennial and Centennial-Scale Hydrological Change in the Central Interior of BC, Canada: A Multi-Proxy Reconstruction of Holocene Climate From Felker Lake

2010· article· en· W2590956196 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jennifer M. Galloway, Adam M. Lenny, Brian F. Cumming

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeology and Paleoclimatology Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHoloceneStalagmiteGeologyDeglaciationPaleoclimatologyClimate changeOceanographyClimatologyHolocene climatic optimumPhysical geographyCentennialGeographyArchaeology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction Paleoclimate records from the North Atlantic region suggest that the abrupt climate changes that characterized the last deglaciation have persisted into the Holocene Epoch as lower amplitude and less severe events (e.g., the ~1500-year Bond Cycle; Bond et al. 2001). Recent paleoecological evidence raises the possibility that Holocene millennial-to-centennial scale climate cycles observed in the North Atlantic are also pervasive in North America where they are manifested as hydrological changes (Springer et al. 2008). For example, the ca. 1,470 ± 500-year Bond Cycle of ice drift in the North Atlantic is recognized as changes in stable isotopes and strontium in a 7000-year stalagmite record from West Virginia (Springer et al. 2008), and may be a harmonic of the ca. 2440-year drought cycle recognized at Big Lake, central British Columbia (BC; Cumming et al. 2002). Centennial-scale cycles, such as the ca. 400 to 650-year quasi-cycle of sea-ice formation and storminess along the shelf of the Barents Sea (Sarnthein et al. 2003) is similar to the ca. 400-year cycle of aridity and windiness documented in the Great Plains of North America (Dean 1997; Yu and Ito 1996).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.161

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeology and Paleoclimatology Research→French-language works237,207→