MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

MRI response to focal salvage HDR prostate brachytherapy for locally recurrent prostate cancer after external-beam radiotherapy.

2016· article· en· W2591020155 on OpenAlexaff
Hans T. Chung, Gerard Morton, Laura D’Alimonte, Andrew Loblaw, Ananth Ravi, M. Wronski, Melanie Davidson, Masoom A. Haider

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicProstate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsHealth Sciences CentreUniversity of TorontoSunnybrook Health Science Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineBrachytherapyProstate cancerExternal beam radiotherapyProstateRadiologyRadiation therapyCryotherapyNuclear medicineCancerInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

e631 Background: For local recurrence after external-beam radiotherapy, salvage therapy options include surgery, brachytherapy, cryotherapy or high-frequency ultrasound, though there is a significant risk of serious complications (e.g. fistula, incontinence, bladder neck contracture). In the meantime, MRI technology has evolved (e.g. DCE and DWI) such that the sensitivity of detecting viable cancer within the prostate is now more than 70%. Therefore, we initiated a pilot study of focal salvage HDR prostate brachytherapy in patients screened with a MRI with the hypothesis that focal treatment, rather than whole gland, would lead to less complications but similar local control. The MRI response is presented here. Methods: This study was approved by the institution’s research ethics board. Eligible patients included: biopsy-confirmed local recurrence > 30 months after completing XRT, MRI demonstrating solitary recurrence confined to the prostate, negative metastatic workup, IPSS < 15, post-XRT PSA < 10ng/mL, prostate volume ≤ 50cc. Salvage ultrasound-based HDR brachytherapy was performed with a prescription dose of 27Gy divided over two implants separated by 1 week to the target volume (TV) as seen on MRI with dose constraints to the urethra and rectum. All MRI scans were completed with 3T and included T2W, DCE and DWI. Lesions suspicious for cancer were scored using PI-RADS methodology pre-brachytherapy, and using a 5-point scale post-brachytherapy. Results: Fifteen patients were accrued. Thus far, 6 of 15 patients have completed a post-brachytherapy MRI (median 530 days; range 307-653). The baseline MRI characteristics of these 5 patients include: PI-RADS 4 (n = 1), 5 (n = 4), not specified (n = 1); median size 9 mm (range 7-9); T2 (n = 5) and T3a (n = 1); median prostate volume 28mL (20-63). In the post-brachytherapy MRI, the treated intraprostatic lesion no longer showed areas of cancer in 5 patients. Two patients developed a new focus of cancer in the prostate. Patients were not routinely biopsied after brachytherapy. Conclusions: Preliminary data from MRI suggests that there is a treatment response in most patients after focal salvage brachytherapy. Clinical trial information: NCT01583920.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.452
Teacher spread0.397 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Oncology→Same topicProstate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment→French-language works237,207→