MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2591084012 · doi:10.1177/2513826x1500100303

Late Seroma Formation During Pregnancy: Case Report and Review of the Literature

2015· article· en· W2591084012 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Kalila Steen, Gabrielle Gauvin, Kimberley Meathrel

Bibliographic record

VenuePlastic Surgery Case Studies · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBreast Implant and Reconstruction
Canadian institutionsQueen's UniversityUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSeromaMedicineSurgeryComplicationBreast augmentationPregnancyMagnetic resonance imagingImplantBreast surgeryRadiologyBreast cancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Breast augmentation surgery is the most common cosmetic surgery in the United States, and seroma is a known complication of breast augmentation. However, late seroma is a rare event and is most associated with textured implants. A 29-year-old woman with a remote history of breast implantation presented to the plastic surgery clinic for evaluation of a swollen breast, which began 24 h postpartum. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed peri-implant fluid maintained within the fibrous capsule. The patient was managed conservatively and the swelling self-resolved without recurrence. The authors report the first known case of a late seroma associated with pregnancy, occurring nine years postoperatively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.063
Threshold uncertainty score0.228

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePlastic Surgery Case StudiesSame topicBreast Implant and ReconstructionFrench-language works237,207