MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A phase Ib/II study of BBI608 combined with weekly paclitaxel in advanced pancreatic cancer.

2016· article· en· W2591143777 on OpenAlexaff
Tanios Bekaii‐Saab, Sameh Mikhail, Adrian Langleben, Carlos Becerra, Derek J. Jonker, Timothy R. Asmis, Gregory M. Coté, Christina Wu, Eunice L. Kwak, Alexander I. Spira, Fadi Braiteh, Stephen Richey, Stephanie Hume, Matthew Hitron, Chiang Li

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer Treatment and Pharmacology
Canadian institutionsOttawa HospitalSt Mary's Hospital Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineTolerabilityInternal medicineGemcitabineTaxaneIrinotecanPaclitaxelPancreatic cancerCapecitabineGastroenterologyOncologyPerformance statusCancerNauseaNeutropeniaChemotherapyAdverse effectBreast cancerColorectal cancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

196 Background: Cancer stemness is thought to be associated with resistance to chemotherapies. BBI608, a first-in-class cancer stemness inhibitor that works through inhibiting the Stat3 pathway, has shown potent synergistic anti-tumor activity with paclitaxel in vivo. In a phase Ib dose escalation study in patients with advanced solid tumors, BBI608 plus weekly paclitaxel was well tolerated and a RP2D of BBI608 480 mg BID was determined. Methods: Patients with heavily pretreated metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma were enrolled in a phase Ib/II extension study to assess safety, tolerability, and preliminary anti-cancer activity in patients with this diagnosis. BBI608 was administered orally at a starting dose of 480 mg or 500 mg twice daily along with paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 IV weekly 3 of every 4 weeks. A sample size of 40 set the bounds of the 90% CI at ±10% to 14%, assuming a DCR of 60% to 80%. Safety and efficacy results for the cohort will be presented as late breaking data. Results: 41 patients were enrolled. Patients had received a median of 2 prior lines of treatment including FOLFIRINOX (71%), gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel (44%), or both (37%). Overall, prior therapy included gemcitabine in 90%, a thymidylate synthetase inhibitor (eg 5FU, capecitabine) in 81%, platinum in 76%, irinotecan in 73%, and taxane in 44%. Protocol therapy was well tolerated. Related grade 3 AE included diarrhea (N = 2, 4.9%), abdominal pain (N = 2, 4.9%), and nausea (N = 1, 2.4%), and were rapidly reversible. For evaluable patients (N = 31), response rate (PR+CR) was 7% and disease control rate (SD+PR+CR) was 52%. In evaluable taxane-naïve patients (N = 19), response rate was 11%, disease control rate was 63%, and 16% were progression free at 24 weeks. Overall (ITT, N = 41) mPFS was 10 weeks and mOS was 24 weeks. For the taxane-naïve patients (ITT, N = 23) mPFS was 16 weeks and mOS was 30 weeks. Conclusions: BBI608 plus weekly paclitaxel has demonstrated safety, tolerability, and promising activity in patients with refractory, heavily pretreated pancreatic cancer; particularly in taxane-naïve patients. Durable disease control and prolonged overall survival in this pre-treated population are notable. Clinical trial information: NCT01325441.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.127
GPT teacher head0.538
Teacher spread0.411 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicCancer Treatment and PharmacologyFrench-language works237,207