MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2591168630 · doi:10.1049/iet-cta.2016.1373

Finite‐gain stability from disturbance to output of linear delay systems via impulsive control

2017· article· en· W2591168630 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueIET Control Theory and Applications · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNeural Networks Stability and Synchronization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersFundamental Research Funds for the Central UniversitiesSouthwest University for NationalitiesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Disturbance (geology)Stability (learning theory)Control (management)Computer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study studies how impulses affect the bounded behaviours of delay system with bounded disturbance. By employing the method of Lyapunov function, several criteria of finite‐gain stability from disturbance to output are established. It is shown that a linear delay differential system can be finite‐gain stabilised from disturbance to output using impulsive feedback control even there is an unstable matrix. Moreover, delay differential equations also maybe finite‐gain stable from disturbance to output under an appropriate sequence of impulses treated as disturbances. Two examples and simulations are also given to illustrate our results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.978
Threshold uncertainty score0.551

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it