Bibliographic record
Abstract
The planned depth of well Dong 11 is 5,780 m, many complicated conditions may exist in the drilling process of this well, such as loose cementation and high risk of hole collapse in the upper formation, leakage of Cretaceous strata, caving mudstone in Jurassic, possible high-pressured saltwater zone and hydrocarbon zone in Sangonghe formation. In addition, this block is located in fault ruptured zone. Based on the above problems, casing program design, BHA design, drill bit selection, drilling fluid design and the cementing design was optimized and the drilling engineering design and site construction of the well was introduced. No complicated condition occurred during the whole well construction. PDC bit was used in the upper well section and PDC bit combined with screw drilling technology was used in lower well section, the average rate of penetration is 4.77 m/h, compared with the offset wells, the drilling speed increased obviously and the good hole diameter validates the serviceability of a strong inhibitive heat-resisting plugging polymer anti-collapse drilling fluid system in this area.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".