The Fieldwork of the Canadian Archaeological Institute at Athens, 2004
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les membres du Projet d’exploration de l’Eubée du Sud-Ouest ont étudié la céramique de la péninsule de Paximadhi, les découvertes et les sites provenant de l’est de la Baie Karystos, et des artefacts de pierre de la période préhistorique; de plus, 36 sites ont été cartographiés, mesurés et photographiés. À Stymphale, on a d’abord préservé la céramique, les objets de métal et le crépi intérieur de murs, puis on a procédé à l’étude des ossements et différents petits objets, de même qu’à celle des fortifications. À Argil os. le dégagement de l’Édifice C s’est poursuivi; de plus, trois nouvelles tranchées, fouillées jusqu’aux niveaux de 600-550 av. J.-C, se sont révélées riches en céramiques. Le survey d’une épave des guerres médiques a récupéré le sauroter découvert en 2003 et étudié les anomalies décelées par le sonar. Enfin, on a entrepris à Kallithea Kastro en Thessalie un projet de cartographie numérique et de prospections architecturales et archéologiques.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.007 | 0.008 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.028 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".