Effect of composite channel aging on the spectral efficiency of multi‐pair massive multiple‐input multiple‐output amplify‐and‐forward relay networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study investigates the spectral efficiency of multi‐pair massive multiple‐input multiple‐output amplify‐and‐forward relay networks by considering the composite channel aging effect. The rational of this work is that the channel aging effect caused by phase noise and node movements is an inevitable practical channel impairment in time‐varying fading channels and substantially degrades the performance. The proposed model comprises multiple sources and multiple destinations, each equipped with a single antenna, which communication via a relay equipped with a very large number of antennas by employing maximal‐ratio combining/maximum‐ratio transmission. Based on this model, the authors first derive a closed‐form lower bound expression for the achievable rate of per source–destination pair. Then, by using the derived expression, they study how the transmitted powers of each source and the relay can be reduced without compromising the spectral efficiency when the number of relay antennas approaches infinity. They also discuss the effect of channel aging coefficients, including Doppler shift and phase noise increment variance, on the asymptotic spectral efficiency under different power scaling laws. Both theoretical analysis and Monte Carlo simulations disclose that the channel aging effect does not affect the power scaling laws but degrades the spectral efficiency.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".