MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Chemoradiation or standard radiation followed by adjuvant temozolomide (TMZ) and 13-cis-retinoic acid (CRA) for high grade glioma in adults - a regional cancer centre study

2005· article· en· W2591492929 on OpenAlexaff
David D. Eisenstat, Catalin Mihalcioiu, A Demers, S. Huszár, G. Schroeder, Kamale Vijay, Keith D. Jones

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsCancerCare Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineTemozolomideAnaplastic astrocytomaGliomaInternal medicineClinical endpointRadiation therapyPhases of clinical researchCancerOncologyGastroenterologySurgeryChemotherapyAstrocytomaClinical trialCancer research

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

1557 Background: A recent phase II study reported activity of TMZ and cRA for recurrent/progressive malignant gliomas with 43% 6 month progression-free survival (PFS); 32% for glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) patients (Jaeckle KA et al, 2003). Methods: From 2000–2003, we retrospectively analyzed adults with malignant glioma who received, following surgery and radiation therapy (RT) ± low dose TMZ (75 mg/m2/d x 42d), TMZ (150–200mg/m2/d, d1–5) and cRA (100 mg/m2/d, d1–21) every 28d for up to 24 cycles or until progression on neuroimaging. Time to progression (TTP) was the primary end-point and overall survival (OS) was the secondary end-point. Results: Of 33 patients (29 GBM, 2 anaplastic astrocytoma, AA, 2 malignant glioma, MG), 18 remain alive. The 33 patients received 308 cycles of TMZ/cRA (mean 9.3 cycles); 9 patients received greater than 10 cycles, but only 2 completed more than 15 cycles. Responses to TMZ/cRA were documented in 15/33 (45%) patients (10 partial responses/5 stable disease). For all patients, median TTP was 38.6 weeks, 50.5 weeks for chemoradiation patients and 27.1 weeks for those who received RT alone prior to TMZ/cRA, NS). Median OS was 103.2 for all 33 patients, 55.3 weeks for RT alone and median time not yet reached for RT/low dose TMZ, p=0.01). 6, 12 and 24 month TTP was 63%/39%/39% (53%/27%/27% for RT alone and 72%/49%/49% for RT/low dose TMZ). OS at 6, 12 and 24 months was 94%, 69% and 43%, respectively, for all 33 patients (86%/50%/25% for RT alone and 100%/86%/75% for RT/low dose TMZ). Conclusions: Our data for malignant glioma patients who received concurrent low dose temozolomide with RT prior to adjuvant temozolomide/cRA compares favourably with the results of the recently completed EORTC/NCIC trial (Stupp R et al, ASCO 2004). The chemoradiation strategy using concurrent low dose temozolomide provides a significant survival advantage when compared to radiation alone. Our study demonstrates that TMZ/cRA prolongs TTP for patients with malignant gliomas when compared to historical controls and supports use of this regimen in a Phase III clinical trial. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.427
Teacher spread0.369 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Oncology→Same topicGlioma Diagnosis and Treatment→French-language works237,207→