MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2591501593

Enantioselective Synthesis of Substituted Polycyclic Heterocycles by Rhodium-catalyzed Ring Opening Reactions of Aryne Diels-Alder Adducts

2010· dissertation· en· W2591501593 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Nguyễn Đức Trung

Bibliographic record

VenueLibrary and Archives Canada (Government of Canada) · 2010
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicChemical synthesis and alkaloids
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNucleophileEnantioselective synthesisChemistryTrifluoromethanesulfonateElectrophileRhodiumCationic polymerizationReactivity (psychology)Ring (chemistry)CatalysisMedicinal chemistryOrganic chemistry
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report the application of our rhodium-catalyzed nucleophilic ring-opening methodology to the enantioselective synthesis of nitrogen-substituted polycyclic heterocycles. By using a cationic Rh(I) triflate catalyst in the presence of the chiral Josiphos ligand PPF-PtBu2, the ring opening reactions on dihydrooxaquinoline and dihydrooxaisoquinoline using different nucleophiles afford access to multiple dihydroquinolines and dihydroisoquinolones in high yield and high enantioselectivity (up to 99% total yield and >99%ee). A variety of nucleophiles were shown to be compatible with the catalytic system. The electronic effects in the new ring opening reactions were investigated using a variety of nucleophiles. It was found that reactivity and enantioselectivity of the ring opening products depends on the electronic effects as well as the position of the substituents on the substrates. Good yields and high ee of regioisomeric products are obtained using electron donating substituents, whereas electron withdrawing substituents decelerate the reactions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.159
Teacher spread0.156 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLibrary and Archives Canada (Government of Canada)Same topicChemical synthesis and alkaloidsFrench-language works237,207