MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2591525254

Lean leiderschap voor (nog) betere teamprestaties

2016· article· nl· W2591525254 on OpenAlexaff
Desirée H. van Dun, Celeste P.M. Wilderom

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Twente Research Information · 2016
Typearticle
Languagenl
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicQuality and Supply Management
Canadian institutionsNuclear Waste Management Organization
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTheologyPolitical scienceBusiness administrationBusinessPhilosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Veel managers en teams hebben moeite om continu te blijven verbeteren. Recent onderzoek van de Universiteit Twente laat zien dat er bij het toepassen van lean meer aandacht nodig is voor gedragsontwikkeling van zowel medewerkers als leidinggevenden. Managers met bepaalde gedragskenmerken creëren een productievere teamcultuur. Als lean leiders het goede voorbeeld geven in hun gedrag en de juiste randvoorwaarden scheppen, wordt continue prestatieverbetering binnen een team niet alleen mogelijk maar ook menselijk.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.575
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.010
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of Twente Research InformationSame topicQuality and Supply ManagementFrench-language works237,207