MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2591525254

Lean leiderschap voor (nog) betere teamprestaties

2016· article· nl· W2591525254 on OpenAlexaff
Desirée H. van Dun, Celeste P.M. Wilderom

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Twente Research Information · 2016
Typearticle
Languagenl
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicQuality and Supply Management
Canadian institutionsNuclear Waste Management Organization
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTheologyPolitical scienceBusiness administrationBusinessPhilosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Veel managers en teams hebben moeite om continu te blijven verbeteren. Recent onderzoek van de Universiteit Twente laat zien dat er bij het toepassen van lean meer aandacht nodig is voor gedragsontwikkeling van zowel medewerkers als leidinggevenden. Managers met bepaalde gedragskenmerken creëren een productievere teamcultuur. Als lean leiders het goede voorbeeld geven in hun gedrag en de juiste randvoorwaarden scheppen, wordt continue prestatieverbetering binnen een team niet alleen mogelijk maar ook menselijk.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.018
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.056
Threshold uncertainty score0.188

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.018
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.003
Scholarly communication0.0100.005
Open science0.0010.007
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0560.014

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of Twente Research InformationSame topicQuality and Supply ManagementFrench-language works237,207