PhageTerm: a Fast and User-friendly Software to Determine Bacteriophage Termini and Packaging Mode using randomly fragmented NGS data
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Bacteriophages are the most abundant viruses on earth and display an impressive genetic as well as morphologic diversity. Among those, the most common order of phages is the Caudovirales, whose viral particles packages linear double stranded DNA (dsDNA). In this study we investigated how the information gathered by high throughput sequencing technologies can be used to determine the DNA termini and packaging mechanisms of dsDNA phages. The wet-lab procedures traditionally used for this purpose rely on the identification and cloning of restriction fragment which can be delicate and cumbersome. Here, we developed a theoretical and statistical framework to analyze DNA termini and phage packaging mechanisms using next-generation sequencing data. Our methods, implemented in the PhageTerm software, work with sequencing reads in fastq format and the corresponding assembled phage genome. PhageTerm was validated on a set of phages with well-established packaging mechanisms representative of the termini diversity: 5’cos (lambda), 3’cos (HK97), pac (P1), headful without a pac site (T4), DTR (T7) and host fragment (Mu). In addition, we determined the termini of 9 Clostridium difficile phages and 6 phages whose sequences where retrieved from the sequence read archive (SRA). A direct graphical interface is available as a Galaxy wrapper version at https://galaxy.pasteur.fr and a standalone version is accessible at https://sourceforge.net/projects/phageterm/ .
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.024 | 0.020 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".