Range of motion predictability after total knee arthroplasty with medial pivot prosthesis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To assess whether there the final range of motion (ROM) results achieved by patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with prosthesis using Medial Pivot design are predictable. Between January and August of 2014, 155 patients with primary osteoarthritis of knee who underwent TKA using the prosthesis ADVANCE® Medial Pivot were prospectively assessed. All ROM measures were made and recorded before, during, and after surgery. All patients were clinically assessed preoperatively and postoperatively (15, 45 days, three months, six months, one year, and annually thereafter after surgery); their functional status was assessed using the WOMAC questionnaire. Significant differences (p < 0.001) were observed between the means and medians of ROM in the preoperative when compared with those during the perioperative; the perioperative values, when compared with those after six months postoperative, were also different (p < 0.001). No significant differences were found between the means and medians ROM between the intraoperative period and at the 45-day assessment (ns) and between the means and medians ROM between the preoperative period and at the six-month evaluation (ns). The final ROM achieved by patients that underwent TKA with medial pivot prosthesis can be predicted. The perioperative ROM correlates with that at 45 days after surgery. The final ROM is correlated with that of the pre-operative period. Avaliar se há previsibilidade da amplitude de movimentos alcançada por pacientes submetidos a artroplastia total do joelho com prótese que usa desenho medial pivot. Entre janeiro e agosto de 2014 foi feita avaliação prospectiva de 155 pacientes com osteoartrose primária do joelho submetidos a artroplastia total do joelho com o uso da prótese Advance® Medial Pivot. Todas as medidas da amplitude de movimentos foram feitas antes, durante e após a cirurgia. Todos os pacientes foram avaliados clinicamente no pré- e pós-operatório (15, 45 dias, três meses, seis meses, um ano e depois anualmente após a cirurgia) para a análise de seu estado funcional. O questionário Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (Womac) foi usado. Diferenças significativas (p < 0,001) foram relatadas entre as médias e medianas da amplitude de movimentos no pré-operatório em comparação com as medidas obtidas no período intraoperatório. As medidas do pré-operatório também se mostraram diferentes quando comparadas com aquelas após seis meses de pós-operatório (p < 0,001). Não foram encontradas diferenças significativas entre as médias e medianas da amplitude de movimento na comparação do intraoperatório e as medidas feitas aos 45 dias (ns) e entre as médias e medianas das medidas pré-operatórias e aquelas observadas aos seis meses (ns). Há previsibilidade da amplitude de movimentos obtida por pacientes submetidos a artroplastia total do joelho com prótese medial pivot. A amplitude aos 45 dias é semelhante àquela observada nas medidas intraoperatórias. A amplitude final está relacionada à amplitude pré-operatória.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".