MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W259159533 · doi:10.3138/cjfs.16.2.82

Sad Bunny: Vincent Gallo and the Melancholia of Gender

2007· article· fr· W259159533 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Marc James Léger

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Film Studies · 2007
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicCinema and Media Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQueerHumanitiesArtArt historySociologyGender studies

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cet article examine deux films réalisés par le cinéaste indépendant Vincent Gallo à la lumière de la théorie queer et de l’analyse des rôles sexuels. La fonction du masochisme masculin chez Gallo s’articule selon un version hétérosexuelle du queer, ce qui permet de rajeunir le cool contre-culturel et de distinguer l’œuvre de Gallo de celles des réalisateurs libéraux grand public Nous utilisons le model sociologique de production culturelle de Pierre Bourdieu pour développer l’idée du cinéma « branché » et expliquer la décentralisation subjective, la thanatophilie et la traumatophilie contemporaines. La psychanalyse et la théorie queer s’amalgament à cette lecture sociologique pour explorer les politiques culturelles de Buffalo 66 et The Brown Bunny de Gallo.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.688
Threshold uncertainty score0.945

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Film StudiesSame topicCinema and Media StudiesFrench-language works237,207