MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2591631161 · doi:10.1137/15m1038694

Analysis of an SDG Method for the Incompressible Navier--Stokes Equations

2017· article· en· W2591631161 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Numerical Methods in Computational Mathematics
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
FundersResearch Grants Council, University Grants Committee
KeywordsMathematicsSuperconvergenceDiscretizationNavier–Stokes equationsDiscontinuous Galerkin methodRate of convergenceConvergence (economics)Mathematical analysisStability (learning theory)Nonlinear systemCompressibilityGalerkin methodApplied mathematicsFinite element methodKey (lock)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we analyze a staggered discontinuous Galerkin (SDG) method for the incompressible Navier--Stokes equations. The method is based on a novel splitting of the nonlinear convection term and results in a skew-symmetric discretization of it. As a result, the SDG discretization has a better conservation property and numerical stability property. The aim of this paper is to develop a mathematical theory for this method. In particular, we will show that the SDG method is well-posed and has an optimal rate of convergence. A superconvergence result will also be shown.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.423
Threshold uncertainty score0.605

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.409
Teacher spread0.356 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it