Pediatric Melanoma: A 35-year Population-based Review
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Melanoma is a rare neoplasm in the pediatric population. Recent publications suggest a possible increase in incidence over the past few decades. The purpose of this study was to analyze trends in pediatric patients diagnosed with malignant melanoma in British Columbia (BC) in the past 35 years. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed. All patients in BC diagnosed with melanoma before 18 years of age from 1979 to 2014 were included. Patient demographics, melanoma description, treatment details, and survival data were collected. RESULTS: Seventy-eight subjects were identified for the study. Patients were equally distributed by sex. Sixty-one (78%) of the subjects were diagnosed in the postpubertal age (≥12 years old). The most common sites of occurrence were the extremities (n = 33) and the trunk (n = 27), with the location on the trunk showing the highest mortality rate (22%). All patients were surgically treated and some had additional chemotherapy (12) and/or radiotherapy (12). Fatal outcome was recorded in 12 of the 78 subjects, 10 of whom had postpubertal diagnosis. The average time from date of diagnosis to date of death was 9.3 years. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of melanoma in the pediatric population remains exceedingly rare: less than 2.5 per million children younger than 18 years. The diagnosis is rarely made before puberty; the incidence is equal in males and females and has not changed over a 35-year time period in BC. Our study shows 85% survival with the majority of patients having had surgical excision only.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it