MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2591649872 · doi:10.1109/tie.2017.2677317

A Predictive Energy Management System Using Pre-Emptive Load Shedding for Islanded Photovoltaic Microgrids

2017· article· en· W2591649872 on OpenAlexaff
Dennis Michaelson, Hisham Mahmood, Jin Jiang

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrogrid Control and Optimization
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicrogridPhotovoltaic systemLoad SheddingEnergy management systemReliability engineeringState of chargeEnergy storageEnergy managementComputer scienceModular designDuration (music)Energy (signal processing)EngineeringAutomotive engineeringBattery (electricity)Control engineeringReal-time computingElectric power systemRenewable energyPower (physics)Electrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents an energy management system (EMS) for an islanded microgrid with photovoltaic generation and battery storage. The system uses a predictive approach to set operational schedules in order to minimize system-wide outages in the microgrid, specifically through pre-emptive load shedding. Four-times daily updated online weather forecasts are combined with the photovoltaic system model to predict energy production over a 48 h period. These predictions are used, along with load forecasts and a model of the energy storage system, to predict the state-of-charge and characterize potential upcoming outages. Outage mitigation actions using pre-emptive load shedding are then planned and executed to avoid outages or minimize the duration of unavoidable outages. The approach also features bounds on the battery state-of-charge to account for uncertainties in the estimate of the stored energy. The EMS has been implemented using an event-driven framework with TCP/IP communication, which is modular and extensible to more complex system configurations. The approach has been validated through simulations and experiments, which demonstrate its feasibility and potential, for the chosen test scenario, to reduce the outage duration by 87% to 100%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations80
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Industrial ElectronicsSame topicMicrogrid Control and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207