MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W259165196

The Local and the Global Revisited: Un 32 Aout Sur Terre

2005· article· fr· W259165196 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Darrell Varga

Bibliographic record

VenueCineaction! · 2005
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicHousing, Finance, and Neoliberalism
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)GlobalizationGlobal citySociologyEconomyPolitical scienceEconomicsGeographyLaw
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In a smoke-filled Montreal cafe, the sound of an electronic pager causes the otherwise cool patrons to scramble in comic-ritualized sameness for the electronic leash until one identifies the alert as directed at him. This scene sets up the context of mediated communication between the main characters in this film and in turn reflects something of the remapping of spatial relationships facilitated through the global flows of capital, people, and culture. One defining characteristic of globalization is the privileging of selected urban centres as nodal points through which international networks of capital are organized--cities such as New York, Tokyo, London, Hong Kong are some of the specific sites where transnational exchange is directed, with secondary cities such as Toronto and Montreal striving to identify as players in this elite network, in part by promoting economic activity in such areas as finance, telecommunications, and cultural production over the traditional base of industrial manufacturing. The consequences of this shift include an increased instability of employment as higher-wage unionized jobs are replaced by a more mobile service-sector and an increased class division between managerial professionals and workers. [ILLUSTRATION OMITTED] This class division is, in turn, reflected in the spatial process of intensified development in selected areas (within the city and throughout the world) and systemic underdevelopment, or marginalization, in others. Of course, these class and spatial divisions are hardly new, Marx's Capital is, among other things, a primary text in the study of globalization in the form of international market expansion through the shift from feudalism to capitalism. Marx demonstrates how capitalist wealth creation requires continual change, yet ruling-class interests seek stability and that this is a key contradiction of capitalism for which ideology emerges as a force of stabilization. With respect to spatial production, stability is regulated through private property and this has become the dominant system through which political economy is organized. Marx illuminates how this system precludes the fulfillment of real human needs. One function of ideological texts such as mainstream cinema is to naturalize relations of production and historically specific approaches to the production of space. Globalization is the intensification of this spatial practice identified by Marx, but it is shaped by a multitude of contradictions in the coherence of local and global needs--contradictions articulated in specific cultural texts such as Un 32 Aout Sur Terre and more generally in considerations of national cinema. Mike Featherstone points out that in addition to elite finance, legal, and management professionals the category of design professional is also located in these key urban centres of globalization. Together, the habitus and interrelation of market-directed activity with cultural production contributes significantly to the production of dominant ideology and it is articulated through cultural texts as much as through political action. As Featherstone indicates: It is the integration of the particular services located in particular quarters of these world cities which produces transnational sets of social relations, practices, and cultures. The process of globalization is therefore uneven, and if one aspect of it is the consciousness of the world as a single place, then it is in these select quarters of world cities that we find people working in environments which rely upon advanced means of communications which overcome time-space separation. (1) But what of those Montreal cafes? Featherstone's argument is set against the simple binary distinction between a global homogenous culture dominated by American media and local particularity that is more rooted, unique and genuine. Instead, local cultural practices may emerge and be understood as unique precisely in response to the intensity of global flows of exchange. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.123
Threshold uncertainty score0.244

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0120.014
Scholarly communication0.0100.005
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0020.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0180.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCineaction!Same topicHousing, Finance, and NeoliberalismFrench-language works237,207