A structural investigation of the Hope Slide, British Columbia, using terrestrial photogrammetry and rock mass characterization
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
On the 9th January 1965, from the southwestern slope of Johnson ridge, 150 km west of Vancouver, approximately 15 km from Hope along the BC Highway 3, a 44 million m3 rock slide fell in two separate events, between 4 am and 7 am (VON SACKEN, 1991); the movement assumed the behavior of a rock avalanche. The sliding mass fell down, filling the Outram Lake, destroying and burying several km of the BC highway 3, sweeping away and killing four people, which were unfortunately never found. As a result of the slide, the valley floor was raised of about 70 m with respect to the original topography. Hope Slide represents the major historical rock avalanche in Canada.\nThis work summarizes the results of a geological, structural and geomorphological survey of Hope Slide, obtained with long-range terrestrial digital photogrammetry (TDP) which allows, through the elaboration of pairs of images, the building of tridimensional models of the object.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it