MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2591683761 · doi:10.1080/19425120.2016.1271845

Movements of Atlantic Sturgeon of the Gulf of Maine Inside and Outside of the Geographically Defined Distinct Population Segment

2017· article· en· W2591683761 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Gail S. Wippelhauser, James A. Sulikowski, Gayle Barbin Zydlewski, Megan Altenritter, Micah Kieffer, Michael T. Kinnison

Bibliographic record

VenueMarine and Coastal Fisheries · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFish Ecology and Management Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Marine Fisheries ServiceAtlantic States Marine Fisheries CommissionMaine Agricultural and Forest Experiment Station
KeywordsBayAcipenserFisheryEstuaryOceanographyCapeSubmarine pipelinePopulationHabitatContinental shelfSturgeonGeographyFish <Actinopterygii>Critical habitatGeologyEcologyEndangered speciesBiologyArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Identification of potential critical habitat, seasonal distributions, and movements within and between river systems is important for protecting the Gulf of Maine (GOM) distinct population segment of Atlantic Sturgeon Acipenser oxyrinchus oxyrinchus. To accomplish these objectives, we captured Atlantic Sturgeon from four GOM rivers (Penobscot, Kennebec system, Saco, and Merrimack) and tagged 144 individuals (83.3–217.4 cm TL) internally with uniquely coded acoustic transmitters. Tagged fish were detected from 2006 to 2014 by primary receiver arrays that were deployed in the four GOM rivers or were detected opportunistically on a secondary group of receivers deployed within the GOM and along the continental shelf. Tagged Atlantic Sturgeon were documented at three spawning areas in the Kennebec system in June and July, including an area that became accessible in 1999 when Edwards Dam was removed. The majority (74%) of tagged fish were detected in the estuaries of the four GOM rivers, primarily in May–October. They spent most of their time in a 45-km reach within the Kennebec system but occupied more limited areas (≤5-km reach) within the Penobscot, Saco, and Merrimack rivers. Approximately 70% of the tagged fish were detected in GOM coastal waters and aggregated in the Bay of Fundy (May–January), offshore of the Penobscot River (September–February and May), offshore of the Kennebec River (September–February), in Saco Bay and the Scarborough River (July–November), and along the eastern Massachusetts coast between Cape Ann and Cape Cod (April–February). Nine tagged Atlantic Sturgeon (7%) left the GOM; three of those individuals moved north as far as Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada, and six moved south as far as the James River, Virginia. Information obtained in this study has been used to make recommendations to avoid or reduce the impacts of in-water projects on Atlantic Sturgeon.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.038
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.189
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMarine and Coastal FisheriesSame topicFish Ecology and Management StudiesFrench-language works237,207