Bibliographic record
Abstract
Il ne suffit plus d'affirmer, comme je l'ai fait il y a plus de vingt ans, que les cultures minoritaires sont structurellement prives du registre du temps 1 , condamnes dans leur imaginaire propre et dans celui qui leur est assign, tmoigner de leur avenir incertain ou encore de leur puisement dans les rcits historiques et mmoriels dominants. Si ce constat reste aujourd'hui pertinent, il ne saurait nullement rendre compte des phnomnes de spatialit qui rgissent de faon complexe tous les ensembles culturels, mme les plus restreints. Qu'en est-il alors de l'espace qui, si l'on en croit Michel Collot, permettrait de dpasser certaines oppositions dbilitantes et de se soustraire l'emprise des dualismes historiques? Une culture peut-elle se rgnrer par la multidimensionnalit d'un sujet inscrit (enracin?) dans les paysages fictifs qui s'offrent sa conscience? 2 Comment mme rpondre cette question dans le cas de cultures qu'une longue histoire de domination a rendues incapables de s'approprier un lieu propre o puisse se construire symboliquement une prsence forte? Une fois le temps 1
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.043 | 0.008 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".