MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2591703419 · doi:10.1109/tci.2017.2678280

Evaluation of Balanced Ultrasound Breast Imaging Under Three Density Profile Assumptions

2017· article· en· W2591703419 on OpenAlex
Pedram Mojabi, Joe LoVetri

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Computational Imaging · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrowave Imaging and Scattering Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInverse problemCompressibilityAttenuationIterative reconstructionTomographyInverse scattering problemInverseUltrasoundInversion (geology)Contrast (vision)Ultrasonic sensorMathematicsAlgorithmComputer scienceMathematical optimizationMathematical analysisAcousticsArtificial intelligenceOpticsPhysicsGeometryGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A balanced inverse scattering algorithm for ultrasonic breast imaging is developed to simultaneously reconstruct quantitative images of the breast's ultrasonic properties. These properties are the inhomogeneous compressibility, attenuation, and density. Three scenarios are considered for this inversion algorithm. First, all the properties are assumed to be independent. The assumption of a linear relation between the contrast of compressibility and inverse density is then considered in the second scenario, whereas the density variation is neglected in the third scenario. The image corresponding to the attenuation is of particular importance because breast tumors can be better identified using this property in comparison with compressibility and density images. However, this contrast is often poorly reconstructed because the magnitude of this contrast in the mathematical formulation of the problem is generally smaller than the magnitude of the contrasts of the other two properties. To overcome this problem, a novel balancing method is applied to all these three inversion algorithms so as to enhance the reconstruction results. Using synthetic data from MRI-based breast models, it is demonstrated that the use of the proposed balancing scheme enhances the reconstruction results of all these algorithms and, in particular, enhances their reconstructed images corresponding to the attenuation profile.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.808
Threshold uncertainty score0.940

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it