MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Falar sobre organização é falar sobre comunicação? Escola de Montreal no estudo de uma Organização brasileira

2016· article· pt· W2591739223 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueComunicologia - Revista de Comunicação da Universidade Católica de Brasília · 2016
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMedia and Communication Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceSociologyMedia studiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Este artigo apresenta um estudo qualitativo em que fazemos a leitura de uma organização da sociedade civil, o Fórum Nacional de Prevenção e Erradicação do Trabalho Infantil – FNPETI, a partir da Escola de Montreal. Nosso objetivo foi compreender a constituição comunicativa do FNPETI pela dinâmica texto – conversação, uma das bases teóricas dessa Escola. O procedimento metodológico foi a análise de uma unidade texto – conversação, extraída de assembleia plenária, cujo tema foi a filiação de novas organizações. Observamos que por meio da linguagem e da interação os agentes construíram sentido e materializaram um texto sobre as filiações. Essa análise nos permitiu aferir o potencial explicativo da Escola de Montreal. Se hipoteticamente suprimirmos o elemento comunicação do Fórum ele corre o risco de deixar de existir. Assim, podemos nos referir ao FNPETI como organização na comunicação.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.332
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.004
Science and technology studies0.0050.005
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0150.008
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it