MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2591823039 · doi:10.1109/antem.2004.7860695

Fast transient analysis of incident field coupling to multiconductor transmission lines

2004· article· en· W2591823039 on OpenAlexaff
G. Shinh, Natalie Nakhla, Ram Achar, M. Nakhla, Ihsan Erdin, Anestis Dounavis

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicLightning and Electromagnetic Phenomena
Canadian institutionsWestern UniversityNortel (Canada)Carleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransient (computer programming)Transmission lineElectric power transmissionOrdinary differential equationComputer scienceTime domainSpiceRepresentation (politics)Coupling (piping)Electronic engineeringField (mathematics)Transmission (telecommunications)Transient analysisTransient responseFrequency domainTopology (electrical circuits)AlgorithmDifferential equationEngineeringMathematicsElectrical engineeringTelecommunicationsMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents an algorithm for fast transient analysis of multiconductor transmission line interconnects in the presence of incident fields. In the proposed approach: (a) The formulation of equivalent external sources due to incident fields is independent of the type of the macromodel used to represent the MTL system and can be represented analytically in the time-domain solely based on the information of per-unit-length parameters of the line and incident field parameters, (b) An efficient passive macromodel based on delay extraction and closed-form representation is used to describe the distributed nature of the MTL stamp. The time-domain macromodel is in the form of ordinary differential equations and can be easily included in SPICE like simulators for transient analysis. The proposed algorithm, while guaranteeing the stability of the simulation by employing passive macromodels, provides significant speed-up for transmission line networks, especially with large delay and low-losses.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.248
Threshold uncertainty score0.610

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicLightning and Electromagnetic PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207