MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2591830972 · doi:10.1139/cjm-2016-0780

Role of the LuxR family transcriptional regulator Lpg2524 in the survival of<i>Legionella pneumophila</i>in water

2017· article· en· W2591830972 on OpenAlexafffundvenue
Laam Li, Sébastien P. Faucher

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Microbiology · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicLegionella and Acanthamoeba research
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsRegulonLegionella pneumophilaBiologyRegulatorMicrobiologyLegionellaOperonGeneTranscriptional regulationPathogenTranscriptomeVirulenceRegulation of gene expressionBacteriaGene expressionGeneticsEscherichia coli

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The water-borne Gram-negative bacterium Legionella pneumophila (Lp) is the causative agent of Legionnaires’ disease. Lp is typically transmitted to humans from water systems, where it grows inside amoebae. Survival of Lp in water is central to its transmission to humans. A transcriptomic study previously identified many genes induced by Lp in water. One such gene, lpg2524, encodes a putative LuxR family transcriptional regulator. It was hypothesized that this gene could be involved in the survival of Lp in water. Deletion of lpg2524 does not affect the growth of Lp in rich medium, in the amoeba Acanthamoeba castellanii, or in human macrophage-like THP-1 cells, showing that Lpg2524 is not required for growth in vitro and in vivo. Nevertheless, deletion of lpg2524 results in a faster colony-forming unit (CFU) reduction in an artificial freshwater medium, Fraquil, indicating that Lpg2524 is important for Lp to survive in water. Overexpression of Lpg2524 also results in a survival defect, suggesting that a precise level of this transcriptional regulator is essential for its function. However, our result shows that Lpg2524 is dispensable for survival in water when Lp is at a high cell density (10 9 CFU/mL), suggesting that its regulon is regulated by another regulator activated at high cell density.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.352
Threshold uncertainty score0.992

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2017
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of MicrobiologySame topicLegionella and Acanthamoeba researchFrench-language works237,207