MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2591835820 · doi:10.3168/jds.2016-11926

Randomized clinical field trial on the effects of butaphosphan-cyanocobalamin and propylene glycol on ketosis resolution and milk production

2017· article· en· W2591835820 on OpenAlexaffabout
Jessica Gordon, S.J. LeBlanc, D.F. Kelton, Thomas H. Herdt, L. Neuder, T.F. Duffield

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Dairy Science · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicReproductive Physiology in Livestock
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
FundersCollege of Engineering, Michigan State UniversityBayer Animal HealthAmerican Association of Bovine PractitionersMichigan State University
KeywordsKetosisAnimal scienceMedicineInternal medicineLactationSalinePlaceboEndocrinologyPregnancyBiologyDiabetes mellitus

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of a butaphosphan-cyanocobalamin combination product (B+C) and 2 durations of propylene glycol treatment (PG; 3 versus 5 d) on ketosis resolution and early lactation milk yield. Cows from 9 freestall herds (8 in Ontario and 1 in Michigan) were tested at weekly intervals between 3 and 16 d in milk. Ketosis was defined as blood β-hydroxybutyrate (BHB) ≥1.2 mmol/L. Ketotic cows were randomly assigned to treatment with 25 mL of B+C or 25 mL of saline placebo for 3 d and 3 or 5 d of 300 g of PG orally in a 2 × 2 factorial arrangement. Outcomes evaluated for all farms included ketosis cure (blood BHB <1.2 mmol/L at 1 wk after enrollment), maintenance of ketosis cure (blood BHB <1.2 mmol/L 1 and 2 wk after enrollment), and blood BHB concentrations at 1 and 2 wk after enrollment. Daily milk weights were collected in 3 herds. Poisson regression was used to evaluate cure and maintenance of cure, whereas repeated-measures ANOVA was used to evaluate blood BHB concentrations in the 2 wk after enrollment and average daily milk production in the 30 d after treatment. A total of 594 animals were enrolled in the study with 124 treated with B+C and 5 d of PG, 176 treated with B+C and 3 d of PG, 128 treated with saline and 5 d of PG, and 166 treated with saline and 3 d of PG. Animals with blood BHB >2.4 mmol/L at the time of enrollment were 1.7 times more likely [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.4 to 2.2] to cure and had a decrease of 0.25 ± 0.11 mmol/L blood BHB at 1 wk after enrollment if treated with 5 d of PG compared with 3 d, though this response was not seen in animals with BHB of 1.2 to 2.4 mmol/L at enrollment. Cows with blood glucose concentrations <2.2 mmol/L at enrollment produced 3.1 kg/d (95% CI: 1.3 to 5.0) more milk if treated with B+C and 3.4 kg/d (95% CI: 1.7 to 5.1) more milk if treated with 5 d of PG compared with their respective controls. This response was not seen in animals with blood glucose ≥2.2 mmol/L at enrollment and there was no interaction between treatments. These results indicate that extended PG treatment is beneficial in decreasing blood BHB concentrations in more severely affected animals. Additionally, both B+C treatment and extended PG treatment improved milk yield in animals with low blood glucose at the time of ketosis diagnosis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations36
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Dairy ScienceSame topicReproductive Physiology in LivestockFrench-language works237,207