Broadband superoscillation brings a wave into perfect three-dimensional focus
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The fundamental properties of a wave precludes it from being localized to subwavelength distances in all dimensions of the wave's existence. The inability to focus electromagnetic waves to an all-direction subwavelength spot limits the 3D resolution of a conventional imaging system to about half the imaging wavelength. A plethora of super-resolution imaging systems have been designed which obtain super-resolution in one or two (but not all) dimensions, but they suffer various restrictions in working distance and the classes of objects they can image. In this paper, we report a first investigation into a wave that is focused to subwavelength dimensions in all directions. After reviewing the physics of wave dispersion and diffraction which seemingly preclude this phenomenon, we sidestep these preclusions using a broadband superoscillation waveform and synthesize an all-direction subwavelength focus. We report the salient spatial and temporal features of this wave, and apply it to achieve 3D super-resolution imaging.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it