MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2591968104 · doi:10.1159/000100029

The 12th International Conference on Continuous Renal Replacement Therapies (CRRT). March 7–10, 2007, San Diego, Calif.

2007· article· en· W2591968104 on OpenAlex
D. Ji, E. Im

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood Purification · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDialysis and Renal Disease Management
Canadian institutionsHealth Sciences CentreManitoba Health
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRenal replacement therapyMedicineIntensive care medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Acute renal failure (ARF) was recently identified as an independent prognostic factor.This late discovery was partially caused by luck of consensus concerning ARF definitions.A huge step towards consensus was recently reached by wide adoption of the RIFLE criterions for ARF definition.In obstetrics, we face also widely disparate definitions for ARF.Some risk factors were clearly retrieved in the majority of studies.Meanwhile, no proof exists if ARF is a mortality risk factor in the critically ill obstetric patients.Objective: Try to determine if ARF is related to mortality in the critically ill obstetric population.Patients and Methods: Open prospective observational study.Setting: Medical surgical intensive care unit part of a university affiliated hospital.Inclusion criteria: critically ill obstetric patients.Exclusion criteria: Chronic renal failure and Kidney transplant.Study period:

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.527
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it