MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2592027959 · doi:10.1617/s11527-017-1019-5

Carbonation front in cement paste detected by T 2 NMR measurements using a low field unilateral magnet

2017· article· en· W2592027959 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMaterials and Structures · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNMR spectroscopy and applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCarbonationPhenolphthaleinMaterials sciencePortland cementCementCuring (chemistry)PorosityComposite materialCarbonatationMineralogyChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Unilateral magnetic resonance was used to obtain the CPMG T 2 decay at different positions along 6 cm long cement paste samples. The aim was to detect the carbonation front based on changes in the pore structure caused by accelerated carbonation and to compare the results with the phenolphthalein test. Cement pastes at water-to-cement ratios of 0.60, 0.50, and 0.40 were prepared using ordinary Portland cement. After moist curing and conditioning at 65% RH and 35 °C, the pastes were subjected to accelerated carbonation with 4% by volume CO2 at 65% RH and 35 °C. Carbonation increases the magnetic resonance T 2 lifetime compared with the control and compared with the noncarbonated region of the samples. A reduction in porosity and changes in the pore size distribution are caused by carbonation. The position with the highest rate of T 2 change was consistent with the fully carbonated front determined by the phenolphthalein test.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.115
Threshold uncertainty score0.575

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it