La dualité entre les sources littéraires et papyrologiques dans les sortes (ou oracles par tirage au sort)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La decouverte des lamelles epigraphiques de Dodone et la toute recente edition de 4216 de ces inscriptions ont marque un tournant dans la recherche mantique puisqu'elles dementent sans appel le portrait quasi-mythique de la divination inspiree telle qu’elle aurait ete pratiquee a Delphes, un portrait idealise qui etait base sur les seules sources litteraires. Tout comme la dualite entre les sources litteraires et epigraphiques qui marquent la comparaison entre les consultations oraculaires de Delphes et de Dodone, les deux portraits offerts par les sortes Vergilianae (selon la litterature) et par les sortes Homericae (selon les papyri) s'opposent fondamentalement. Les sortes Vergilianae dans la litterature presentent des points communs avec les seances oraculaires delphiques et en partagent plusieurs topoi . Si les lamelles oraculaires de Dodone n'avaient pas ete retrouvees, c'est cette seule perspective qui aurait valeur aujourd'hui. Pourtant, beaucoup d'efforts sont encore requis pour eradiquer celle-ci des etudes modernes, tant elle s'y est incrustee. Nancy DUVAL Universite de Montreal nancy.duval@hec.ca
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".