Educación ciudadana y convivencia en contextos de violencia: desafíos transnacionales a la construcción de paz en escuelas de México
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The paper examines teachers’ understandings of social conflicts, and their reported implemented curriculum regarding citizenship education, based on a series of focus group workshops with 5-6 interested teachers in each of three schools in marginalized, violent neighborhoods in one Mexican city. Teachers identified a variety of conflicts affecting their students, including direct violence (domestic/gendered, gangs, bullying) and social structural interest conflicts (emigration, pollution, drug trafficking, unemployment, labor exploitation). These conflicts’ transnational dimensions were generally not acknowledged. We argue that the imaginaries of conflict and democratic action shaping participants’ teaching practices were influenced by hegemonic neoliberal discourses of citizenship—detached from transnational social structural dynamics, with causal explanations and solution alternatives limited to individual values choices. Such a narrow, security-oriented approach to citizenship and convivencia education would function to govern marginalized populations more than to enhance democratic agency.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it