MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2592191139

Microwave tomography for breast cancer detection: Study of dispersion and heterogeneity effects

2006· article· en· W2592191139 on OpenAlexaff
Abas Sabouni, Sima Noghanian, Stephen Pistorius

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Symposium on Antenna Technology and Applied Electromagnetics · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrowave Imaging and Scattering Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicrowave imagingMammographyBreast cancerDispersion (optics)Inverse scattering problemInverse problemMedical imagingIterative reconstructionDielectricMicrowaveScatteringComputer scienceMaterials scienceAcousticsOpticsCancerPhysicsMathematicsComputer visionArtificial intelligenceMedicineMathematical analysisTelecommunicationsOptoelectronics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper addresses a two-dimensional inverse scattering numerical technique for microwave imaging for breast cancer detection. We present an accurate and efficient way to obtain the location, shapes, and dielectric properties of malignant tumors inside the body. The accuracy of the reconstructed image is achieved because the dispersion properties and spatial heterogeneous characteristics of the normal biological tissue are assumed. This method is a non-destructive imaging technique that combines frequency domain finite difference time domain (FD)2TD analysis with genetic algorithm (GA) optimization. The applications of the proposed method can vary from medical imaging to nondestructive testing of materials and structures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.000
Threshold uncertainty score0.001

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.002
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Symposium on Antenna Technology and Applied ElectromagneticsSame topicMicrowave Imaging and Scattering AnalysisFrench-language works237,207