MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Pseudo-compatibility in Tradescantia paludosa

2008· article· en· W2592193320 on OpenAlexfundno aff
ARIF M. QARAÉEN

Bibliographic record

VenueHereditas · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant and animal studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersInstitute of Genetics
KeywordsPollenTradescantiaBiologyGynoeciumInflorescenceBotanyclone (Java method)Pollen tubeStamenPollinationGeneGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Two clones of Tradescantia paludosa, S1S2 and S3S4, were investigated for impairment of self-incompatibility after X-irradiation. Inflorescences were exposed to X-rays in a series of doubled doses ranging from 50r to 1600r, and pollen from opening irradiated flowers was applied to unirradiated pistils from the same clone during an 8-day period. In clone S3S4 self seed set was only caused by pollen from buds irradiated at stages in microsporogenesis preceding the first pollen mitosis, at a rate corresponding to 5–20 seeds per 105 pollen grains applied. In clone S1S2 even pollen obtained from flowers irradiated at the binucleate stages of microsporogenesis caused self seed-set, 50–200 seeds per 105 pollen grains applied. Irradiated pistils pollinated with unirradiated self pollen gave no seed-set, whereas self seed-set was obtained when both pistil and pollen had been irradiated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.060
Threshold uncertainty score0.360

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.089
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.123 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHereditasSame topicPlant and animal studiesFrench-language works237,207