Bibliographic record
Abstract
Devising an optimal strategy for navigation in a partially observable environment is one of the key objectives in AI. One of the problem in this context is the Canadian Traveler Problem (CTP). CTP is a navigation problem where an agent is tasked to travel from source to target in a partially observable weighted graph, whose edge might be blocked with a certain probability and observing such blockage occurs only when reaching upon one of the edges end points. The goal is to find a strategy that minimizes the expected travel cost. The problem is known to be P$\#$ hard. In this work we study the CTP theoretically and empirically. First, we study the Dep-CTP, a CTP variant we introduce which assumes dependencies between the edges status. We show that Dep-CTP is intractable, and further we analyze two of its subclasses on disjoint paths graph. Second, we develop a general algorithm Gen-PAO that optimally solve the CTP. Gen-PAO is capable of solving two other types of CTP called Sensing-CTP and Expensive-Edges CTP. Since the CTP is intractable, Gen-PAO use some pruning methods to reduce the space search for the optimal solution. We also define some variants of Gen-PAO, compare their performance and show some benefits of Gen-PAO over existing work.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.026 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.021 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".