MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Polatuzumab Vedotin Combined with Bendamustine (B) and Rituximab (R) or Obinutuzumab (G) in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory (R/R) Follicular Lymphoma (FL) or Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL): Preliminary Results of a Phase Ib/II Dose-Escalation Study

2016· article· en· W2592287337 on OpenAlexaff
Alex F. Herrera, Matthew J. Matasar, Sarit Assouline, Manali Kamdar, Amitkumar Mehta, Isabelle Fleury, Won Seog Kim, Tae Min Kim, Francesc Bosch, John Radford, Lilian Bu, Wan‐Jen Hong, Laurie H. Sehn

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalHôpital Maisonneuve-RosemontBC Cancer AgencyJewish General Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineDiffuse large B-cell lymphomaInternal medicineTolerabilityRituximabBendamustineFollicular lymphomaOncologyGastroenterologyAdverse effectLymphomaSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction: Patients with transplant ineligible R/R FL or DLBCL have poor outcomes. Polatuzumab vedotin (PoV) is an antibody drug conjugate (ADC) designed for the targeted delivery of the potent microtubule inhibitor MMAE to cells expressing CD79b. PoV combined with R has previously demonstrated promising response rates in patients (pts) with R/R FL and DLBCL. The addition of B to PoV-R and substitution of G for R could improve outcomes in these pts. We report preliminary results from the safety run-in portion of a Phase Ib/II study evaluating PoV combined with BR or BG in R/R FL or DLBCL and the expansion cohort evaluating PoV combined with BG in R/R DLBCL (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02257567). Methods: This multicenter, open-label study evaluates the safety and tolerability of PoV combined with B (90 mg/m2) and R (375 mg/m2) or G (1000 mg). Adult pts were treated with PoV 1.8 mg/kg intravenously with BR or BG every 28 days for FL pts and every 21 days for DLBCL pts for a total of 6 cycles. Response assessment was performed following 3 cycles of study treatment (tx), end of study tx, and every 6 months for 2 years during the follow-up period. Results: As of May 2, 2016, 45 pts have been enrolled; 24 pts (12 FL, 12 DLBCL) in the safety run-in portion and 21 R/R DLBCL pts the expansion cohort. Baseline characteristics for safety-evaluable patients are shown in Table 1. At the time of this report, all 24 pts in the safety run-in portion and 19 pts in the expansion cohort have completed at least one response assessment. Among the 44 pts enrolled in the FL and DLBCL cohorts who received at least one dose of study tx, the most common adverse events (AEs) in > 20% of pts were nausea (50%), diarrhea (45%), fatigue (39%), pyrexia (29%) and constipation (27%). In the FL safety run-in cohorts, 67% (8/12) patients had Grade 3/4 AEs and 25% (3/12) had serious AEs (SAEs). The most common Grade 3/4 AEs in ≥ 10% of FL pts were neutropenia (33%) and thrombocytopenia (17%) and were attributed to study tx. No single SAE occurred in more than 1 pt. AEs led to study tx interruption in 2 pts and one pt discontinued bendamustine due to grade 3 thrombocytopenia. Treatment-emergent Grade 1 peripheral neuropathy was reported in 3 pts and did not lead to study tx discontinuation. PoV was dose reduced from 1.8 mg/kg to 1.4 mg/kg in 1 pt with Grade 1 neuropathy who was able to complete study tx. In the DLBCL safety run-in and expansion cohorts, 78% (26/32) of safety-evaluable pts had Grade 3/4 AEs and 53% (17/32) of pts had SAEs. The most common Grade 3/4 AEs in ≥ 10% of pts were neutropenia (25%), thrombocytopenia (13%), and pneumonia (13%) and the most common SAEs ≥ 10% of pts were pneumonia (19%) and pyrexia (16%). AEs led to study tx interruption in 15 pts and led to study tx discontinuation in 5 pts. Three pts died due to AEs (1 due to general physical health deterioration, 2 due to pneumonia) all of which were not related to study tx. One pt died due to progressive disease. Grade 1 peripheral neuropathy was reported in 5 pts and did not lead to study tx interruption or discontinuation. Grade 2 peripheral motor neuropathy was reported in 1 pt, which led to study tx discontinuation. Best objective response by PET/CT for evaluable pts as of May 2, 2016 is reported in Table 2. The objective response rate (CR+PR) was 100% in R/R FL and 65% in R/R DLBCL. The majority of pts who achieved a CR or PR remain in response. Of the 3 DLBCL pts who achieved a CR or PR on the PoV + BR safety run-in cohort, all 3 remain in remission with a median follow-up of 8.4 months with one pt remaining in response for 14 months. 83% (5/6) of FL pts continue to be in CR or PR with 3 pts remaining in response for over 9 months. The duration of responses for pts treated on the PoV + BG is not reported due to insufficient follow-up and will be updated at the time of presentation. Conclusions: Preliminary evaluation of efficacy showed promising durable responses in heavily pre-treated R/R FL and DLBCL patients. In addition, PoV combined with BR or BG has an acceptable safety profile in pts with R/R FL and DLBCL and confirmed the PoV dose of 1.8 mg/kg to be the recommended phase 2 dose. The safety and efficacy data will be updated at the time of presentation. Disclosures Herrera: Genentech: Research Funding; Immune Design: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Research Funding. Assouline:BMS: Speakers Bureau; Lundbeck: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Speakers Bureau. Kamdar:Seattle Genetics: Speakers Bureau. Mehta:Merck: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Roche Genentech: Research Funding; Medimmune: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding. Fleury:Lundbeck: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Kim:Celltrion, Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria. Bosch:Hoffman La Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Millennium: Research Funding. Radford:Novartis: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Seattle Genetics: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; GSK: Equity Ownership; Astra-Zeneca: Equity Ownership; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Bu:Roche: Employment. Hong:Genentech: Employment. Sehn:roche/genentech: Consultancy, Honoraria; amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; seattle genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria; abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria; TG therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria; celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; lundbeck: Consultancy, Honoraria; janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood→Same topicLymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment→French-language works237,207→